See, you got Dior makin’ moves in sustainability, all fancy and high-end. Then, BAM! You got some random Reddit thread talkin’ ’bout it. And then there’s the whole thing about getting into a Dior fashion show, which, let’s be real, is harder than finding a decent parking spot downtown. No tickets, just pure, unadulterated *connections*, apparently. I mean, seriously? Talk about exclusive.
Then you got these… replicas? Seriously? Dior replicas? Like, even *mentioning* that alongside talk about sustainability feels kinda… wrong. It’s like serving caviar on a paper plate. Just… nah. No no no.
But then the real kicker, and where the export quality comes in, is this dataset. 800-ish exported products, 166 countries… it’s a HUGE amount of data. Someone’s crunching numbers, trying to figure out how good Dior’s stuff is *when it leaves the building*. And not just slapping a unit value on it, but, according to some Harding and Javorcik study (whatever that is), using a *more sophisticated* measure. Fancy!
I guess what gets me is… what *is* “export quality” for a brand like Dior anyway? Is it just about making sure the seams don’t split when a bag travels across the ocean? Or is it about the whole package? The brand image, the perceived luxury, the whole shebang? I mean, that’s gotta factor in *somehow*, right? You can’t just measure quality by counting threads per inch, can you?
And like, I’m looking at this “Enfield Mart” thing… and it’s all in… whatever language that is (guessing Chinese?). So, I’m guessing it’s not *officially* sanctioned Dior information.