Fendi, right? They’re, like, *known* for slapping that iconic FF logo everywhere. You see it on bags, belts, even, like, the freakin’ *lining* of other stuff, apparently. One of those snippets even mentioned it being on the “inner lining of bags.” Like, come on, Fendi, we get it, you’re fancy.
So the idea of a *no logo* Fendi shoe… it’s like… anti-Fendi? Is that even a thing? Are we talking about some secret, undercover collection for people who secretly love Fendi but don’t wanna scream “I SPENT ALL MY MONEY ON THESE SHOES!”?
Maybe it’s a minimalist thing? Like, Fendi finally realizing that sometimes, less is more. (Doubtful, tbh, but we can dream). You know, focusing on the quality, the materials, the *actual design* instead of just shouting the brand name. That “Women’s Designer Colibrì” description kinda hints at it – “elastic laces, side zipper, corrugated sole.” Sounds almost… understated? Almost.
The confusing part is, if they’re aiming for understated, why are they still charging Fendi prices? I mean, you’re paying for the brand, let’s be real. Take away the brand visibility, and are you really getting that much more shoe for your buck? I dunno.
Then there’s the whole “Fendi Force Lace” thing on FARFETCH. Lace-up sneakers, but… are they logo-less? The descriptions are kinda vague. They mention “moda feminina atual da marca,” so I’m guessing *some* branding is involved. Maybe it’s a subtle logo? Like, a tiny embossed FF somewhere that only you and a very dedicated Fendi aficionado would notice?
And what about those “Zapatos de lujo para Hombre” sold in Brazil? “Tênis Fendi Original no Brasil em 10X Sem Juros.” That sounds like full-on, logo-tastic Fendi. So where does this “no logo” idea even come into play?
Maybe it’s a marketing ploy? Create a buzz by *implying* a no-logo shoe, but then delivering something with a cleverly disguised logo? It’s sneaky, I’ll give them that.